What is real
is not external form.



CONSTANTIN BRANCUSI

Tech battle of the decade: Apple vs. Qualcomm on IP rights

28.02.2019


The IP industry often generates and manages conflicts between smaller or larger companies willing to defend their intellectual property rights and everything related to them. Thus, wars are born that can stretch over prolonged periods of time, especially when giant companies, with powerful financial resources, that operate in several jurisdictions are involved.

A relevant case in this respect is Apple vs. Qualcomm case, two American companies that have had a successful partnership for a long time, centered on the well-known iPhone. The first developed the interface and software, and the latter have provided the hardware. Nevertheless, Qualcomm has sued Apple, on many occasions, for patent infringement in the use of communications technology for which they claim that Apple has not paid and does not own copyrights. The technology provider claims that Apple continues to use its technology for the smartphones produced, although they are not entitled to do so. In its defense, Apple said that the patents in question were used for older iOS versions, and therefore the recent versions used for smartphones do not violate Qualcomm patents.

Apple declared that for the recent models, it has been using technology acquired by Intel, none other than the Qualcomm’s competitor. On a first glance, it would seem that the problem can be solved, but that is far from the truthOn the contrary, at the beginning of 2019 Qualcomm accused Apple of giving Intel access to their technologies to make them able to enhance the performance of Intel’s chips on iPhones.

Qualcomm’s demand is that Apple should stop selling the smartphones that use technology for which they refuse to pay and do not own any rights. It is now up to the courts to decide a resolution in this case after an expertise is carried concerning how much of Qualcomm’s claims are proven to be true. Meanwhile, for Apple to stop selling certain iPhone models instantly, Qualcomm is required to make a $765 million deposit to cover Apple’s damage if the allegations prove to be unfounded.

 

08.11.2019

Intellectual property considerations on street art

When you think about graffiti, or any other form of street art, does it even cross your mind how quickly intellectual property theft can become an issue? And when it comes to graffiti, it doesn’t necessarily need to be a Banksy artwork, an aspect which transforms it immediately into something valuable. Even if it is ( learn more )

05.11.2019

Trademark monitoring- one step ahead of infringements

Nowadays, protecting your business by registering your trademarks and developing an IP portfolio will definitely increase the value of your business. Also known as a trademark monitoring service, or simply Trademark Watch Service, the main objective of this service is to detect any similar trademark request in the publication stage, and to let you know ( learn more )

31.10.2019

Chinese domain name dispute resolution services by WIPO

For those unfamiliar with what WIPO stands for, WIPO is the main agency acting on an international level, under which Intellectual Property services, policies and information are developed in a balanced and effective way, helping us bring innovation and creativity into our lives. Even if you are not familiar with the acronym UDRP, you certainly ( learn more )